{"id":1385,"date":"2014-10-02T09:24:52","date_gmt":"2014-10-02T09:24:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/?p=1385"},"modified":"2014-10-02T09:24:52","modified_gmt":"2014-10-02T09:24:52","slug":"bbcs-programme-on-shale-gas-remiss-in-its-neglect-of-climate-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/bbcs-programme-on-shale-gas-remiss-in-its-neglect-of-climate-change\/","title":{"rendered":"BBC&#8217;s programme on Shale Gas remiss in its neglect of climate change"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Response to Costing the Earth\u2019s programme: A decade of Fracking<br \/>\n<\/strong><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">BBC Radio 4; 1<\/span><sup>st<\/sup><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">\u00a0Oct 2014; 21.00hrs.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>This is a copy of an email sent to the BBC following Wednesday&#8217;s airing of the programme<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Presenter Tom Heap noted during the introduction to the programme that he would consider the issue of global warming. However, again the BBC completely missed the more important climate change concerns &#8211; focussing instead on localised methane emissions and industry claims that these could be remedied through maintaining well integrity and a schedule of rigorous monitoring.<\/p>\n<p>At no point did the programme address whether shale gas would be a genuine substitute for high carbon coal, and, even if this were to be the case, whether the emissions from Shale Gas (another high-carbon energy source) could be reconciled with the UK\u2019s climate change commitments. These are pivotal issues that academic colleagues and I have raised repeatedly<a title=\"\" href=\"x-webdoc:\/\/435C51D9-66B9-4814-9248-CEECE32B9418\/#_ftn1\">[1]<\/a>, and which the previous Department of Energy and Climate Change\u2019s (DECC) chief scientist emphasised in his report for the government<a title=\"\" href=\"x-webdoc:\/\/435C51D9-66B9-4814-9248-CEECE32B9418\/#_ftn2\">[2]<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>If a country brings any additional fossil fuel reserve into production, then in the absence of strong climate policies, we believe it is likely that this production would increase cumulative emissions in the long run. This increase would work against global efforts on climate change.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Just last week\u00a0Ban Ki-moon closed the UN climate summit in New York by reaffirming international leaders\u2019 commitment to maintain the global average temperature rise below the 2\u00b0C characterisation of dangerous climate change. The past year has seen the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provide clear guidance to policy makers as to what the 2\u00b0C threshold represents in terms of available carbon budgets; i.e. the total quantity of carbon dioxide that can be emitted. Against this backdrop, the perfunctory coverage of climate change in the BBC\u2019s Costing the Earth was seriously remiss and highly misleading.<\/p>\n<div>Kind regards<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Kevin<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><br clear=\"all\" \/><\/p>\n<hr align=\"left\" size=\"1\" width=\"33%\" \/>\n<div>\n<p><a title=\"\" href=\"x-webdoc:\/\/435C51D9-66B9-4814-9248-CEECE32B9418\/#_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a>\u00a0For example, in a submission to the Energy and Climate Change Committee, see:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.parliament.uk\/pa\/cm201213\/cmselect\/cmenergy\/writev\/isg\/m30.htm\">http:\/\/www.publications.parliament.uk\/pa\/cm201213\/cmselect\/cmenergy\/writev\/isg\/m30.htm<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p><a title=\"\" href=\"x-webdoc:\/\/435C51D9-66B9-4814-9248-CEECE32B9418\/#_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a>\u00a0Professor David MacKay and Dr Tim Stone. Potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Shale Gas Extraction and Use. DECC. 9<sup>th<\/sup>\u00a0Sept. 2013 (p.33)<\/p>\n<div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Response to Costing the Earth\u2019s programme: A decade of Fracking BBC Radio 4; 1st\u00a0Oct 2014; 21.00hrs. This is a copy of an email sent to the BBC following Wednesday&#8217;s airing of the programme Presenter Tom Heap noted during the introduction to the programme that he would consider the issue of global warming. However, again the BBC completely missed the more important climate change concerns &#8211; focussing instead on localised methane emissions and industry claims that these could be remedied through maintaining well integrity and a schedule of rigorous monitoring. At no point did the programme address whether shale gas would\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_s2mail":"yes"},"categories":[43,1],"tags":[],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":5}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1385"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1385"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1385\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1387,"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1385\/revisions\/1387"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}