{"id":1348,"date":"2014-08-27T10:21:35","date_gmt":"2014-08-27T10:21:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/?p=1348"},"modified":"2014-08-27T10:28:53","modified_gmt":"2014-08-27T10:28:53","slug":"full-global-decarbonisation-of-energy-by-2034-and-probably-before","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/full-global-decarbonisation-of-energy-by-2034-and-probably-before\/","title":{"rendered":"Full global decarbonisation of energy before 2034*"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This brief blog provides the\u00a0<span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">headline numbers underpinning my disagreement with Glen Peters&#8217; (Aug 27<\/span><sup>th<\/sup><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"> 2014)<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">\u00a0estimate of the time available to remain within a 2\u00b0C\u00a0carbon budget of 1000GtCO2 (for the period 2011-2100).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"><strong>Glen tweets that:<\/strong><br \/>\n<\/span><em style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">\u00a0\u201c<\/em><em style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">At current emissions rates it will take 30 yrs to emit enough CO2 to pass 2\u00b0C\u201d<br \/>\n<\/em><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 In a later tweet he notes &#8230;<br \/>\n<\/span><em style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">\u201cThe 30 years is 66% chance. About 1000GtCO2 from 2011, from IPCC WG1 SPM \u2026<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"><strong>In contrast, I suggest:<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.714285714;\"><strong>&#8211;<\/strong> At current (2014) emission levels, the 1000Gt will be consumed in less than <em><strong>23 years<\/strong>.<\/em><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"><strong>&#8211;<\/strong> But with CO<\/span><sub>2<\/sub><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"> certain to rise over the coming few years, then, at the likely 2020 emission level, there will\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">be <em><strong>~13.5 years<\/strong><\/em> until the full 2\u00b0C carbon<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">\u00a0budget will have been consumed; i.e. <em><strong>full decarbonisation of\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.714285714;\"><em><strong>energy before 2034.<\/strong><\/em><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"><strong>&#8211;<\/strong> This is a much more challenging decarbonisation agenda than Glen\u2019s 30yr figure suggests<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">_______<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">Background to the 23-year figure (from the end of 2014)<br \/>\n<\/strong><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"><strong>&#8211;<\/strong> CO<\/span><sub>2<\/sub><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">\u00a0emissions in 2000 were 24.787Gt, in 2012 these had risen to 35.425Gt<\/span><sup>1<br \/>\n<\/sup><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"><strong>&#8211;<\/strong> This is a mean growth rate of a little over 3% p.a. for 2000 to 2012; a period that included, arguably,\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.714285714;\">the most severe global financial crisis since the Great Depression.<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.714285714;\"><strong>&#8211;<\/strong> Assuming emissions have continued to grow at ~3% p.a., then emissions for this year (2014) are likely to be ~37.5Gt.<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"><strong>&#8211;<\/strong> The IPCC&#8217;s 1000GtCO<\/span><sub>2<\/sub><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"> carbon budget is for the period 2011 to 2100.<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"><strong>&#8211;<\/strong> Emissions from 2011 to the end of 2014 (i.e. four months from now), will be ~144Gt,\u00a0leaving ~856Gt for the period 2015 to 2100.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em><strong><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">If emissions were to stabilise at the current (2014) level of ~37.5GtCO<\/span><sub>2<\/sub><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">, the remaining 865Gt would be used up in 23 years; i.e. during 2037.<\/span><\/strong><\/em><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Background to the under 14-year figure (from the end of 2020)<br \/>\n<\/strong><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">&#8211; Given the Paris 2015 COP is, at best, seeking agreement on post 2020 mitigation, emissions\u00a0are\u00a0almost certain to grow over the coming few years.<sup>2<\/sup><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.714285714;\">&#8211; Assuming current emissions continue grow at ~3% p.a., then emissions for the year 2020\u00a0will<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">\u00a0be ~44.8GtCO<\/span><sub>2<\/sub><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">.<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.714285714;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><strong style=\"font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.714285714;\">&#8211;<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: 1rem; line-height: 1.714285714;\"> Following on from the above, by the end of 2020 in the region of 394Gt of the 1000Gt will have b<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">een emitted, leaving a budget of\u00a0 ~606GtCO<\/span><sub>2<\/sub><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"> for the period 2021 to 2100.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>If emissions were to stabilise at<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">\u00a0the &#8216;likely&#8217; 2020 emission level<\/span>\u00a0of ~45Gt, the remaining 606Gt would be used up in under 14<span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">\u00a0years, i.e. before 2034.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/strong><\/em><span style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\">__________<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong style=\"line-height: 1.714285714; font-size: 1rem;\"><sup>*<\/sup>\u00a0NB:<\/strong> if Annex 1 nations were to begin a programme of radically reducing their energy consumption (&amp; hence emissions) over the coming decade, there may be scope for non-Annex 1 nations to continue emitting energy-related CO<sub>2<\/sub> out towards 2050<\/p>\n<p><strong><sup>1<\/sup><\/strong>\u00a0Figures taken from the Global Carbon Atlas <a href=\"http:\/\/www.globalcarbonatlas.org\/?q=emissions\">http:\/\/www.globalcarbonatlas.org\/?q=emissions<br \/>\n<\/a><strong><sup>2<\/sup><\/strong>\u00a0It may well be that emissions growth\u00a0actually\u00a0exceeds the 2000-2012 mean level (~3% p.a.),<br \/>\nparticularly if the global economic\u00a0\u2018recovery\u2019 continues.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>To get an early response to Glen&#8217;s estimate, I have pulled the above analysis together in quick fashion; if there are any important errors (in the numbers or maths) please feel free to email me &#8211; thanks.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This brief blog provides the\u00a0headline numbers underpinning my disagreement with Glen Peters&#8217; (Aug 27th 2014)\u00a0estimate of the time available to remain within a 2\u00b0C\u00a0carbon budget of 1000GtCO2 (for the period 2011-2100). Glen tweets that: \u00a0\u201cAt current emissions rates it will take 30 yrs to emit enough CO2 to pass 2\u00b0C\u201d \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 In a later tweet he notes &#8230; \u201cThe 30 years is 66% chance. About 1000GtCO2 from 2011, from IPCC WG1 SPM \u2026 In contrast, I suggest: &#8211; At current (2014) emission levels, the 1000Gt will be consumed in less than 23 years. &#8211; But with CO2 certain\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_s2mail":"yes"},"categories":[43,1],"tags":[],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":5}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1348"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1348"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1348\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1360,"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1348\/revisions\/1360"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1348"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kevinanderson.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}